MV ‘CAP HUDSON’

Images of Panamax Containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ in New York Harbor        4,255 TEU Fully Cellular Container Built 2009

IDENTIFICATION: Ex-names are CPO Savannah, UASC Shuaiba. Launch Name was UASC Shuaiba. Panamax Containership, Call Sign A8UL4, IMO Number 9440837.Built at Hyundai HI, Liberia Flagged, GL Classed, Length Overall of 262.00 m., Length Between Perpendiculars of 248.70 m., Draught of 12.50 m., Beam of 32.20 m., Gross Tonnage of 41,358, Moulded Depth of 19.50 m., Tonnage of 24,234 International Net and 50,928 Dwt (long). ENGINE DETAILS: Engine Description 2 S.A. 8-cyl., Engine Model 8RTA82 Wartsila Engine, Speed of 24.00 kts at 130.00 tonnes per day, Heavy Fuel Oil, Horsepower of 49163. 1 Propellor, 1 Bow Thruster(s) of 1500.00.

OWNER / MANAGER DETAILS: Reederei Claus-Peter Offen, website: http://www.offenship.de. Operators are Hamburg-Sud.

CARGO HANDLING DETAILS: Teu Capacities of 4,255 Total, 2,811 Homogeneous and 1,120 Reefer, Dwt to Teu ratio of 12.16. Total Teu Capacity of 4,255. Crew complement of 22 people,  CARGO HANDLING: 560 Reefer Plugs.

MAIN ENGINE: 1 x Diesel – Wartsila 8RTA82 2-stroke 8-cyl. 820mm x 2646mm bore/stroke – 36,160mkW total at 102rpm.

AUXILIARY: 2 x Aux. Diesel Gen – Himsen 8H25/33 – 4-stroke 8-cyl. 250mm x 330mm bore/stroke 4,800mkW total at 900rpm driving 2 x AC generator(s) at 4,500ekW total, (5,625kVA total) 450V at 60Hz, 2 x Aux. Diesel Gen – Himsen 6H25/33 – 4-stroke 6-cyl. 250mm x 330mm bore/stroke 3,600mkW total at 900rpm driving 2 x AC generator(s) at 3,380ekW total, (4,225kVA total) 450V at 60Hz, 1 x Emergency Gen – 4-stroke driving 1 x AC generator(s) at 150ekW total, (187.50kVA total) 450V at 60Hz.

PROPULSOR: 1 x FP Propeller (Aft Centre) (mechanical), 102rpm.

POS, PROPULSOR: 1 x Pos, Tunnel Thruster (Fwd.) (electric) (Bronze) at 1,500ekW total, 450V AC.

OTHER ENGINE EQUIPMENT: 1 x Boiler, Oil Fired – Alfa Laval – 26.87 m2 at 9 bar, 1 x Boiler, Exhaust Gas Heated – Alfa Laval – 172m2 at 9 bar, 1 x Screw Shaft.

CARGO EQUIPMENT: 372 x Sockets, Reefer – (Deck) 440V at 60Hz, 3-phase, 32A, 188 x Sockets, Reefer – (Hold) 440V at 60Hz, 3-phase, 32A, 1 x Loading Instrument – Seacos MACS3.

LIFTING EQUIPMENT: No Cargo Gear.

PASSENGER EQUIPMENT: 1 x Elevator, Passenger – Hyundai Elevator.


 

MV CAP HUDSON 1@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Starboard bow view. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 2@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Starboard bow view. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 3@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 4@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 5@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. View of the accommodation. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 6@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Against lower Manhattan skyline. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 7@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Starboard stern view detail. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 8@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 9@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 10@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 11@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Lower Manhattan skyline in the background. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime

MV CAP HUDSON 12@

Built in 2009 at Hyundai Heavy Industries, panamax containership MV ‘Cap Hudson’ departing New York Harbor; (4,300 teu, 2009, Hyundai Heavy). Is this an asset class under the danger of extinction? Definitely under-valued and under-appreciated at present. Image credit: Karatzas Photographie Maritime


© 2013 – present Basil M Karatzas & Karatzas Marine Advisors & Co.  All Rights Reserved.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMERS:  Vessel description is provided in good faith and is believed to be correct and accurate but no assurances, warranties or representations are made herewith. Vessel description is provided for entertainment  purposes only. We have no responsibility whatsoever for any errors / omissions in vessel description.

Access to this blog signifies the reader’s irrevocable acceptance of this disclaimer. No part of this blog can be reproduced by any means and under any circumstances, whatsoever, in whole or in part, without proper attribution or the consent of the copyright and trademark holders of this website. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that information herewithin has been received from sources believed to be reliable and such information is believed to be accurate at the time of publishing, no warranties or assurances whatsoever are made in reference to accuracy or completeness of said information, and no liability whatsoever will be accepted for taking or failing to take any action upon any information contained in any part of this website.  Thank you for the consideration.

Images posted on this blog are typically minimally processed gpeg images of lower resolution. Original images are typically shot in RAW format, which can be provided upon special request.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s